Plastic Free Laundry Detergent Guide – 2020 Update

One of my big projects last year was trying to find a more sustainable laundry detergent. It ended up being a much bigger undertaking than I originally anticipated, but I wrote up my findings in a very long post: Plastic Free Laundry.

The good and bad news is that since sharing that information in 2019, there are more options than ever when it comes to looking for planet friendly products. More people are trying to lower their impact and companies are responding to the demand – great!

The not so great – not all companies and products are created equally, and we have to be careful not to fall for greenwashing and products that just don’t get the job done.

I believe it’s important that consumers like us are able to make informed decisions. I also know that we all have valid and varying priorities when it comes to living the “green life.” That makes it difficult to provide a straightforward answer when it comes to determining which brand is the most sustainable.

Of course I can give a recommendation based on my priorities, and don’t worry, I do! But what works for me might not work for everyone. And that’s okay! That’s why I decided to gather the relevant information in one place for easier side-by-side comparison, and share it here with you.

Plastic Free Laundry Detergents Quick Guide

Plastic Free Laundry Detergent | Brand Comparison Chart | Quick Guide | zero waste, plastic free living

Become a Patron for access to the PDF version of the Quick Guide! Search for the “printables” post on Patreon for the latest password to the Printables page of HandyFinch.com and have access to all the materials.

For more information about each product, jump to the Plastic Free Laundry Detergents Detailed Comparison Spreadsheet.

My Sustainable Priorities

When evaluating which of these laundry detergent options is the “most sustainable,” I kept 5 priorities in mind:

  1. Plastic free packaging – My starting point: finding a product without unnecessary plastic packaging.
  2. Minimal shipping footprint – This is a bit trickier to quantify, but essentially a product that weighs less will have a smaller footprint because it reduces the shipping cost. Some ingredients are more necessary than others. For example, why pay to transport a liquid detergent when water comes out of my tap so economically?
  3. Actual cleaning power – Not only do I want a product that removes dirt and grease, but I also want a product that can disinfect and actually get my clothes hygienically clean.
  4. Planet and human friendly ingredients – Chemicals can be intimidating and scary. They can be destructive in terms of both how they are produced, their effects on humans, and their impacts on the planet when we’re done with them. Trying to find a product with the least harmful ingredients was a top priority, but defining “least harmful” and “most sustainable” is complex.
  5. Price – Sustainable products aren’t really sustainable if only the most economically advantaged can use them. The importance of affordability and accessibility should not be overlooked or undervalued.

For more details about each priority, check out each section below.

This was my starting point, and it really helped narrow down the field. If a product didn't have plastic free or nearly plastic free packaging, I did not investigate it or include it for comparison.

Proactively Plastic Free Packaging

Several companies are "proactively plastic free" in their packaging, seemingly in response to consumer demand for plastic free products:

  • Blueland
  • Dropps
  • Earth Breeze
  • EC30 (although please note that the parent company of this brand is P&G, which is not proactively plastic free)
  • Seventh Generation - not all products - ONLY the new Plastic Free line offered exclusively through Grove.co
  • Sheets
  • The Simply Co.
  • TruEarth
  • Truman's

That's quite a few more brands than there used to be, so way to go consumers! Nice work demanding better and using your purchasing power to prompt change!

Have Plastic Free Packaging Options

Some companies aren't totally plastic free for all of their products, but do have specifically plastic free options for the laundry products included in the comparison chart:

  • Nellie's
  • Meliora
  • Ingredients Matter

I'd like to go into a little more detail about the plastic free option from Ingredients Matter. They do sell liquid cleaning products in plastic bottles, but it was unclear whether the powdered laundry soap came in a plastic free box. I sent them a message asking for more information, and I was especially impressed with their response. Because of their response I felt it was more accurate to include them here than in the next category.

First, they actually responded and thanked me for writing and encouraging companies to change! That doesn't always happen, so I count this highly in their favor. Secondly, they explained in some detail about their packaging and how they are actively seeking better solutions. Right now, inside the box is a paper bag lined with a "biodegradable film." They didn't say it specifically, but I assume the lining is some form of polyvinyl alcohol, which I discuss in greater detail in the "Human and Planet Friendly Ingredients" section. They also stated that their shipping is plastic free.

Probably or Mostly Plastic Packaging Free

A few products appear to be plastic free, or mostly plastic free, but I have not ordered them personally to confirm. Refer to the comparison chart for more details. The manufacturers are not proactively plastic free, so the packaging for these products seem to be a byproduct rather than anything intentional:

  • Proctor & Gamble Tide Powder Laundry Detergent
  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfumes & Dyes

Why did I even include these last options if I wasn't sure they were 100% plastic free? Because everything's a compromise, and these products also happen to be the cheapest options.

Despite their limitations, they are still better options than a plastic jug of liquid laundry detergent.

Do NOT Actually Have Plastic Free Packaging

These are products that looked like they were plastic free, but turned out to have plastic packaging after all:

  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free and Clear: Biokleen website said the box was recyclable, however I have been informed that the powder comes in a plastic bag inside the box. Therefore I am removing it from the "Probably" category to the "Not" category. (Updated July 31, 2020)

Probably my vaguest criteria, but the main idea here is to avoid shipping anything "unnecessary." But what's unnecessary?

Given the wide variety of ingredients used, that's an area for some intense debate. Each product will likely assure you that they, and only they, have the formula exactly right. But how many different soaps and detergents does one product need? Is sodium percarbonate important or not? Do more ingredients always mean more clean, or is simple better? This is an area too subjective for me offer an opinion on every single ingredient.

I do think, however, that we can safely include two ingredients in the "unnecessary" category: water and polyvinyl alcohol. Both of these ingredients in turn affect packaging capacity, another important factor.

Water

One of the most obvious ingredients to avoid shipping is water. When water is readily available from taps, why should we waste resources (like fuel) shipping liquid detergents?

Fortunately, the only liquid on this list is the liquid pod from Dropps. All the rest are either dry pods, sheets, tablets, or powders.

On a personal note, I was using Dropps liquid pods in conjunction with their booster pod, and was happy with the results. But what partly set off this 2020 re-evaluation was wanting to find an alternative to the liquid pod.

Polyvinyl Alcohol

I consider polyvinyl alcohol, sometimes listed as PVA or PVOH, unnecessary because its inclusion is one purely of convenience. I discuss this controversial ingredient in more detail in a later section, but it warrants some discussion here as well.

Polyvinyl alcohol is the biodegradable film that surrounds the detergent pods or serves as the support matrix for the laundry sheets. Rather than ship their products in a powdered form, the manufacturers decided to make life slightly more convenient for us by pre-measuring and encapsulating "serving sizes." This saves us the simple step of having to measure the amount of detergent for ourselves.

I don't see the point, and I think it's wasteful. My dad tells me to never pay for convenience, and in this case I agree. The pod and sheet products cost more than the powdered detergent options. But there's another side to cost to keep in mind.

The film doesn't come from nothing - it requires resources (a type of cost) to make. It doesn't weigh much, but it isn't weightless either, which means that much more product to ship. It might not seem like much for just one person, but imagine how many loads of laundry are run around the world in a year.

We have to take into consideration how all these little things add up if we want to effect change. In fact, all the little things adding up is one of the basic tenets of the zero waste and plastic free movements! With all the assorted costs in mind, I say avoid it if possible!

Packaging Capacity

Finally, I think another area to consider in terms of "necessity" is the capacity of the packaging itself. I think of this as both loads per delivery and loads per square foot. The powdered detergent options win out here, especially compared to pods.

I haven't calculated each product one by one, but obviously it's more efficient to fill a container with powder than with pods. It might be a closer call comparing powder to sheets, but that brings us right back to the PVA problem. Take out the PVA and it takes up even less space. The less a product weighs, the less fuel it takes to ship

The higher the capacity of the packaging, the fewer trips the delivery person has to make to my house in a year. We save fuel and reduce human labor, too.

The following products have a higher packaging capacity, containing no water or polyvinyl alcohol:

  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfume and Dyes
  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Blueland Laundry Tablets
  • Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap, Fragrance Free
  • Meliora Laundry Powder
  • Meliora Oxygen Brightener
  • Nellie's Laundry Soda
  • Nellie's Oxygen Brightener
  • P&G Tide Powder Laundry Detergent
  • Seventh Generation Free & Clear Laundry Detergent
  • Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets
  • The Simply Co. Laundry Detergent

I discuss the importance of these two critical ingredients in much greater detail, citing many sources, in my previous post, but I will summarize here.

For me, laundry hygiene is a huge priority because I am immune compromised due to the treatment I rely on for keeping my autoimmune arthritis under control. And especially now with COVID raging, I value germicidal power even more!

That said, there are many definitions for what it means to be "clean," and for many people, the antimicrobial power of their laundering process just isn't very important. If that's the case for you, this discussion won't be relevant. Feel free to skip this section!

Part 1: Activated Oxygen Bleach

Four factors influence laundry efficiency and hygiene: time, temperature, mechanical action, and chemistry. Chemistry is the most important factor, with bleach having the biggest antimicrobial effect.

Chlorine bleach (aka Clorox, also called sodium hypochlorite) is just one type of bleach. Activated oxygen bleaches (AOBs) are other bleaching agents that are color safe. Hydrogen peroxide is a color safe AOB.

We get hydrogen peroxide (a liquid) in our non-liquid laundry detergents via sodium percarbonate. This ingredient can be listed many ways, including sodium carbonate peroxide and even simply as hydrogen peroxide. While it sounds similar, it's important to note that sodium percarbonate is not the same as sodium carbonate (washing soda/soda ash) or sodium bicarbonate (baking soda).

Sodium percarbonate is essentially crystalized hydrogen peroxide. Which is good news for us as far as germ killing power is concerned! When exposed to water, sodium percarbonate breaks down into hydrogen peroxide and sodium carbonate. It’s a simple, safe, unavoidable chemical reaction.

As a point of interest - sodium percarbonate is the main active ingredient in products like “OxiClean” – this is just the chemistry behind that "magical power"!

Part 2: Bleach Activators

Unfortunately for our purposes, as explained in more detail in my other post and according to Wikipedia, “By themselves these bleaching agents are only effective at wash temperatures of 60 °C (140 °F) or above and so are often used in conjunction with bleach activators, which facilitate cleaning at lower temperatures.”

The two most common bleach activators are tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) and sodium nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate (NOBS), which was originally developed by Proctor & Gamble (P&G).

When the sodium percarbonate combines with water and the bleach activators, it forms peracetic acid, another color safe bleaching agent that is more effective at lower temperatures than hydrogen peroxide.

Presence in Plastic Free Detergents

Products that contain BOTH activated oxygen bleach and a bleach activator

I could only find two plastic free products that contain both activated oxygen bleach and a bleach activator. Both products have some disadvantages as well as advantages:

  1. Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster: sodium percarbonate + TAED
    • Disadvantages
      • not a detergent, just a "booster," so would need to used in conjunction with another product, adding to cost
      • has polyvinyl alcohol film and several other ingredients produced with petrochemicals like ethylene
    • Advantages
      • fairly high "B" ingredient safety rating from Environmental Working Group (EWG)
      • company is proactively plastic packaging free and environmentally conscious
  2. Tide (Proctor & Gamble) Powder Laundry Detergent: sodium percarbonate + NOBS
    • Disadvantages
      • very low EWG ingredient safety rating of "D"
      • contains many ingredients produced with petrochemicals like ethylene
      • parent company P&G has a historically terrible environmental record
      • may be small amounts of plastic with packaging, eg carrying strap, possible box lining (but still less plastic than a standard liquid detergent jug)
    • Advantages
      • one of the cheapest solutions, coming in at only $0.19 per load
      • no polyvinyl alcohol

In this category, if cost is not the limiting factor, I consider the Dropps Oxi Booster paired with an additional product to be the more sustainable option.

Have AOB but no activator:

  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfumes & Dyes
  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Nellie's Oxygen Brightener (booster only)
  • Meliora Oxygen Brightener (booster only)
  • Seventh Generation Free & Clear Powder Laundry Detergent
  • Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets
  • The Simply Co. Laundry Detergent
  • Truman's Get a Load of This Laundry Bars

Have neither activated oxygen bleach nor activator:

  • Blueland Laundry Tablets
  • Dropps Sensitive Skin Laundry Detergent Pod, Unscented
  • Earth Breeze Laundry Sheets
  • Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder
  • Nellie's Laundry Soda
  • Meliora Laundry Powder
  • Proctor & Gamble EC30 Laundry Swatches
  • Sheets Laundry Detergent Sheets - Free and Clear
  • TruEarth Eco-Strips Laundry Detergent

Trying to assess which ingredients are the "least harmful" and "most sustainable" is complex. I assess the ingredients in two ways:

  1. sustainability of production, and
  2. toxicity and harm to human health and the environment

Sustainability of production proved the more difficult to determine, so I go into some detail to explain my process and conclusions. Toxicity and harm to human health, on the other hand, is much easier to determine as there are many resources available to evaluate the potential for harm of many products and ingredients.

The use of petrochemicals and byproducts of the fossil fuel industry, like ethylene, benzene, methane, and sulfur, in the production of laundry detergent ingredients, even the "plant based" and "plant derived" ones, is a topic that took me a lot of research to try to understand.

The webpage "The Dirty Secret" by Ingredients Matter got me started in this area of investigation, and I recommend you check the page out, too. They have a list of ingredients common in laundry detergents, many of which show up in the "eco friendly" and "plastic free" options under review here. They also have a list of petrochemicals that are used to make those ingredients.

What are petrochemicals?

Petrochemicals (also known as petroleum distillates) are the chemical products obtained from petroleum by refining. Some chemical compounds made from petroleum are also obtained from other fossil fuels, such as coal or natural gas, or renewable sources such as maize, palm fruit or sugar cane.

The two most common petrochemical classes are olefins (including ethylene and propylene) and aromatics (including benzenetoluene and xylene isomers).

"Petrochemical," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/22/2020.

What the Ingredients Matter page lacks, however, is detailed explanations of the chemistry involved in the production of each ingredient they label as problematic. They give you A and B, but not how A leads to B. Unfortunately, I couldn't find how A leads to B laid out clearly anywhere online, let alone collected in one convenient place. I am attempting to rectify that problem here.

I didn't want to take their claims at face value, either, because, let's be honest, at the end of the day, they're selling something too. They are selling the idea that "soap" is a better option for cleaning laundry than "detergents" precisely because it avoids those pesky petrochemicals.

Like I said, I had a hard time tracking down the actual manufacturing processes. Often each ingredient has many names, and there are many steps to create each one, which meant peeling back layer after layer just to try to get some answers. Sometimes I couldn't find much information about an ingredient at all.

Overall, the opaqueness was frustrating, and left me feeling resentful of the shadiness behind so many ingredients. This area definitely requires increased activism. It isn't enough for manufacturers to disclose the ingredients in their products. The must also disclose exactly how those ingredients are produced. Especially when making claims about a product being "plant based" or "sustainable." It should not be so difficult for consumers make informed decisions.

Why am I sharing all of this detailed and technical information here?

  • a) I spent all the time looking it up, so I may as well share the information so others don't have to waste the time looking it up again;
  • b) I think it's important for everyone to have a basic understanding of how all these pieces fit together; and,
  • c) by demonstrating my process of getting to the bottom of some of these ingredients, I hope to empower others to research additional ingredients that puzzle them.

Please keep in mind - I am not a chemist. The last chemistry class I took was in high school, nearly 15 years ago. I've done my best to understand the information and share it in the simplest way possible. Everything here is to the best of my knowledge and understanding. If any readers have more technical experience and see anything wrong, please, please share your knowledge with the rest of us by leaving a comment!

What is Ethylene?

Let's start with the Encyclopaedia Britannica:

"Ethylene (H2C=CH2), the simplest of the organic compounds known as alkenes, which contain carbon-carbon double bonds. It is a colourless, flammable gas having a sweet taste and odour. Natural sources of ethylene include both natural gas and petroleum; it is also a naturally occurring hormone in plants, in which it inhibits growth and promotes leaf fall, and in fruits, in which it promotes ripening."

"Ethylene," Encyclopedia Britannica, written by Francis A. Carey
Associate Professor of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Accessed 7/22/2020.

"Ethylene is produced by several methods in the petrochemical industry... Although of great value industrially, ethylene is rarely synthesized in the laboratory."

"Ethylene," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/22/2020.

While in ethylene is a "natural" chemical and theoretically could be derived from plants, right now it is not.

Why do we care about ethylene? After all, "ethylene" isn't listed as an ingredient in any of the products. It matters because ethylene is often used in the production of the ingredients that are listed. Even some of the ones described as "plant based" and "plant derived."

Ethylene and other petrochemicals and fossil fuel byproducts are sneaky!! Often ethylene is partially tucked away and hidden in the names of the ingredients. Sometimes all we see is "eth." Like, "ethoxylated," and "laureth."

Until ethylene is produced entirely from renewable sources, all of its derivative ingredients cannot be considered truly sustainable.

The following sections explore in more detail some of the ways ethylene and other petrochemicals are used in the production of some of these laundry products.

Ethylene and Polyvinyl Alcohol

Polyvinyl alcohol, sometimes listed as polyvinyl alcohol film and abbreviated as PVA or PVOH, is the water soluble material used used in the outer layer in all the "pods" and also as the supporting structure in all the "sheets."

When I took a closer look at this ingredient, I started with the Dropps website's explanation:

"PVOH is made via a two-stage reaction process. The process starts with the basic starting molecule, called vinyl acetate, comprised of 3 simple atoms (carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.) In the first reaction step, vinyl acetate is reacted with itself at high temperature and pressure so that it polymerizes to form polyvinyl acetate...

[It] goes through one more process (hydrolysis) where it is reacted with water to create the PVOH we use for the water-soluble membrane on our pods."

"The Science Behind PVOH," by Dropps. Accessed 7/22/2020.

According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica,

"Vinyl acetate (CH2=CHO2CCH3) is prepared from ethylene by reaction with oxygen and acetic acid over a palladium catalyst."

"Polyvinvyl acetate," Encyclopaedia Britannica, WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Accessed 7/22/2020

Put most simply, it all starts with ethylene:

  1. ethylene + oxygen + acetic acid + palladium -> vinyl acetate
  2. vinyl acetate + vinyl acetate + heat -> polyvinyl acetate
  3. polyvinyl acetate + hydrolysis -> polyvinyl alcohol film

Honestly, this is a huge disappointment for me. It's great that the final product is considered biodegradable, but given the choice, I'd rather opt for an ingredient that doesn't require petrochemicals for its production. And until the manufacturers PROVE that their ethylene is sustainably produced, we have to assume it isn't.

The following products contain PVA/PVOH:

  • Dropps Sensitive Skin Laundry Detergent Pod
  • Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster Pod
  • Earth Breeze Laundry Sheets
  • EC30 (P&G) Laundry Swatches
  • Sheets Laundry Detergent Sheets
  • TruEarth Eco-Strips Laundry Detergent
  • Truman's Get a Load of This Laundry Bars

The following products are PVA/PVOH free:

  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfumes & Dyes
  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Blueland Laundry Tablets
  • Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder (though do note that the packaging for this product most likely DOES have PVA)
  • Meliora Laundry Powder
  • Meliora Oxygen Brightener (booster only)
  • Nellie's Laundry Soda
  • Nellie's Oxygen Brightener (booster only)
  • Seventh Generation Free & Clear Powder Laundry Detergent
Ethylene, Benzene and Hydrogen Peroxide, Oxides, and Bleach Activators

Sadly even sodium percarbonate and TAED (those super important ingredients for getting a hygienic clean) are ethylene based. Also, the "B" in NOBS (the original bleach activator) stands for benzene, another petrochemical.

Sodium percarbonate = sodium carbonate + hydrogen peroxide

Today, hydrogen peroxide is manufactured almost exclusively by the anthraquinone process, which was formalized in 1936 and patented in 1939. It begins with the reduction of an anthraquinone (such as 2-ethylanthraquinone or the 2-amyl derivative) to the corresponding anthrahydroquinone.

"Hydrogen peroxide," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

If you want to read more about the anthraquinone process, I recommend reading "The Manufacture of Hydrogen Peroxide" published by the New Zealand Institute of Chemistry. Anthraquinone can itself be produced in a few ways, all of which ultimately begin with benzene and/or ethylene, both of which are petrochemicals.

A commercially viable process to produce hydrogen peroxide directly from the environment has been of interest for many years... None of these [systems] has yet reached a point where they can be used for industrial-scale synthesis.

"Hydrogen peroxide," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

Essentially, at this time, sodium percarbonate ultimately originates from a petrochemical.

Hydrogen peroxide is problematic for the "oxide" category of ingredients, which are noted on the Ingredients Matter webpage as well. Lauryldimethylamine oxide (for disclosure, an ingredient of TruEarth Laundry Strips) is good example. We'll focus on the last bit of the name, "amine oxide."

Almost all amine oxides are prepared by the oxidation of either tertiary aliphatic amines or aromatic N-heterocycles. Hydrogen peroxide is the most common reagent both industrially and in academia.

"Amine oxide," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/27/2020.

You can't make hydrogen peroxide with ethylene or benzene, and you can't make the -amine oxide without hydrogen peroxide.

The bleach activator TAED is another ethylene-based ingredient.

Tetraacetylethylenediamine, commonly abbreviated as TAED, is an organic compound with the formula (CH3C(O))2NCH2CH2N(C(O)CH3)2. This white solid is commonly used as a bleach activator in laundry detergents and for paper pulp. It is produced by acetylation of ethylenediamine.

"Tetraacetylethylenediamine," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

To summarize TAED production:

  1. ethylene + chlorine gas -> 1,2-dichloroethane
  2. 1,2-dichloroethane + ammonia + pressure -> ethylenediamine
  3. ethylenediamine + acetyl group -> tetraacetylethylenediamine

For a list of which products contain AOBs and activators, see the "Actual Cleaning Power" tab, subsection Presence in Plastic Free Detergents.

More Ethylene Based Ingredients

Before I really understood about ethylene, I was trying to dig into some of the ingredients a little deeper, and by chance I picked an ingredient from Dropps: Polyethylene Glycol Monododecyl Ether.

Knowing what I know now, it's totally obvious that this a problematic ingredient because it actually has "ethylene" tucked in the name! But it's still a good example of my exploration and research process.

So let's step back to a time when I was more innocent, and, not knowing much of anything, clicked the "see more" link on Dropps' ingredients webpage. It brought me to the EPA's "Safer Ingredients" site, listing of dodecyl alcohol, ethoxylated (CAS #9002-92-0).

[ Just an aside about the EPA's "safer ingredients" - in general this is a good thing! But you have to keep in mind that the EPA is rating the ingredients based on their toxicity, not whether or not the ingredients are sustainably produced.]

"Dodecanol, or lauryl alcohol, is an organic compound produced industrially from palm kernel oil or coconut oil. It is a fatty alcohol. Sulfate esters of lauryl alcohol, especially sodium lauryl sulfate, are very widely used as surfactants. Sodium lauryl sulfate, ammonium lauryl sulfate, and sodium laureth sulfate are all used in shampoos."

"Dodecanol," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

Basically, dodecanol is a compound from coconut oil. So far, so good. It's a plant, so technically ingredients made from it are "plant derived." But it's only half the picture. The problem is with "ethoxylated." According to SafeCosmetics.org,

"Ethoxylation is the process of reacting ethylene oxide with other chemicals to make them less harsh...

WHAT TO LOOK FOR ON THE LABEL: PPG, PEG, polysorbate and ingredients that end in –eth such as laureth, steareth, ceteareth...

WHAT ARE ETHOXYLATED INGREDIENTS? Ethoxylated ingredients on their own are of low concern, however, the process of ethoxylation, may leave behind trace amounts of carcinogens."

"Ethoxylated Ingredients," SafeCosmetics.org. Accessed 7/23/2020.

This means that Polyethylene Glycol Monododecyl Ether = dodecanol + ethylene oxide. The ingredient does come partly from a plant, but also partly from petrochemicals.

AND, to add insult to injury here, upon further investigation, I learned that Polyethylene Glycol Monododecyl Ether is essentially just a longwinded, sneaky synonym for sodium laureth sulfate (SLES), an ingredient the EWG rates a C because of its aquatic toxicity! (They're both ethoxylated dodecyl alcohol).

Other ethoxylated alcohols are common detergent ingredients, too.

Another example of a tricky ingredient is cocamidopropyl betaine, described by TruEarth as a "coconut oil based, biodegradable amphoteric surfactant (cleaning agent) and foam booster."

"Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) is a mixture of closely related organic compounds derived from coconut oil and dimethylaminopropylamine [DMAPA]."

"Cocamidopropyl betaine," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

Coconut oil seems pretty innocent and self explanatory, but a little more digging tells us that,

"DMAPA is commonly produced commercially via the reaction between dimethylamine and acrylonitrile."

"Dimethylaminopropylamine," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

and,

"Acrylonitrile is produced by catalytic ammoxidation of propylene,"

"Acrylonitrile," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

and finally,

"Propene, also known as propylene or methyl ethylene..."

"Propene," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/23/2020.

And there it is - ethylene again! In summary:

  1. methyl ethylene + ammoxidation -> acrylonitrile
  2. acrylonitrile + dimethylamine -> dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA)
  3. DMAPA + coconut oil -> cocamidopropyl betaine

Once again, "coconut based" is only half the story. The other half is a chemical made from a petrochemical, even though we don't have any direct clues in the product name.

Methane and Methanol

Looking at the components of cocamidopropyl betaine leads nicely into a discussion of methanol.

We looked at half of DMAPA (acrylonitrile) but not the other half, dimethylamine. Let's go ahead and break it down, too:

"The molecule consists of a nitrogen atom with two methyl  substituents and one proton.

"Dimethylamine," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Further,

"A methyl group is an alkyl derived from methane."

"Methyl group," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

If you follow the climate crisis at all, you're probably familiar with methane as a greenhouse gas. According to the Environmental Defense Fund,

"Methane is the primary component of natural gas - a common fuel source... Methane can come from many sources, both natural and manmade. The largest source of manmade emissions is the oil and gas industry."

"Methane: The other important greenhouse gas," EDF.org. Accessed 7/29/2020.

In sum, methane is another petrochemical.

Where else does methane turn up? For one, dimethylamine should already sound familiar; it's part of "lauryldimethylamine oxide," discussed in the "Ethylene, Benzene and Hydrogen Peroxide, Oxides, and Bleach Activators" subsection.

As for other places, pretty much anywhere you see "methyl" or even just "meth," you can probably trace the roots back to methane. For example, let's take an ingredient from Seventh Generation, sodium carboxymethyl inulin. SG describes it as a "plant-based soil dispersant."

It looks like inulin is the "plant based" part of this ingredient:

"Inulins are a group of naturally occurring polysaccharides produced by many types of plants,[1] industrially most often extracted from chicory.[2] The inulins belong to a class of dietary fibers known as fructans...

Chicory root is the main source of extraction for commercial production of inulin. The extraction process for inulin is similar to obtaining sugar from sugar beets.[5] After harvest, the chicory roots are sliced and washed, then soaked in a solvent; the inulin is then isolated, purified, and spray dried."

"Inulin," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

What about "sodium carboxymethyl"?

"Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) or cellulose gum[1] is a cellulose derivative with carboxymethyl groups (-CH2-COOH) bound to some of the hydroxyl groups of the glucopyranose monomers that make up the cellulose backbone. It is often used as its sodium salt, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose...

It is synthesized by the alkali-catalyzed reaction of cellulose with chloroacetic acid."

"Carboxymethyl cellulose," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Let's keep peeling back the layers.

"Chloroacetic acid is prepared industrially via two routes. The predominant method involves chlorination of acetic acid, with acetic anhydride as a catalyst... The second method entails hydrolysis of trichloroethylene.

"Chloroacetic acid," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Okay, so the second method clearly takes us to ethylene, the other common pretrochemical, but what about the first method, with acetic acid?

"Acetic acid is the second simplest carboxylic acid (after formic acid). It consists of methyl group attached to a carboxyl group."

"Acetic acid," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

And we're right back to methyl groups. Which, as we learned earlier, come from methane.

To summarize:

  • methane -> methyl group
  • methyl group + carboxyl group -> acetic acid
  • acetic acid + chlorine -> chloroacetic acid
  • chloroacetic acid + cellulose -> sodium carboxymethyl cellulose
  • sodium carboxymethyl cellulose + inulin -> sodium carboxymethyl inulin

One of the haziest categories of problematic ingredients for me to understand is glucosides, and the potential use of methanol in their production. Examples of "green" glucosides include lauryl glucoside, also known as dodecyl glucoside, (in Truman's and Blueland) and caprylyl glucoside (in TruEarth).

"The name [glucoside] was originally given to plant products of this nature... It has now been extended to include synthetic ethers, such as those obtained by acting on alcoholic glucose solutions with hydrochloric acid.

A better method of preparation is to dissolve solid anhydrous glucose in methanol containing hydrochloric acid. A mixture of alpha- and beta-methylglucoside results."

"Glucoside," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/22/2020.

The problem with this explanation, however, is two fold. First, the explanation comes almost directly from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica entry on glucosides. That's pretty dated, so I can't rule out the possibility that there is a different modern method of production that doesn't use methanol.

Secondly, even methanol itself may not be entirely problematic. The Methanol Institute (perhaps not a completely unbiased source) explains,

"Methanol is produced in a number of different ways, but the primary method is through the synthesis of natural gas...

Methanol also can be produced from non-petroleum feedstocks such as landfill methane gas, municipal solid wastes, biomass, sawdust or even marine seaweed, potentially reducing our dependence on petroleum imports. These renewable feedstocks make methanol a virtually unlimited resource."

"Methanol Facts," Methanol.org. Accessed 7/29/2020.

This information shows that methanol, and even methane, aren't necessarily always petroleum industry chemicals. They can be by products of other (problematic) industries as well.

That said, even if methane/methanol can come from other sources, I don't see any proof that it actually has done so in the production of these ingredients. Absent that proof, I don't consider these potentially methane-based ingredients to be sustainable.

Sulfur and Sodium Coco Sulfate (SCS), Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS), and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES)

Sulfur is a common element, well known for its "rotten eggs" odor.

"Today, almost all elemental sulfur is produced as a byproduct of removing sulfur-containing contaminants from natural gas and petroleum...

Many surfactants and detergents (e.g. sodium lauryl sulfate) are sulfate derivatives."

"Sulfur," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Yep, just another fossil fuel industry byproduct making its way into laundry detergent ingredients. Even the coconut oil derived ones.

Sodium coco sulfate (SCS), sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), and sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) are all derived from dodecyl alcohol, which we covered earlier. As a reminder, it's the fatty alcohol that can come from coconut oil, palm oil, or can be derived synthetically from ethylene via the Ziegler process. What's the difference between them?

Sodium laureth sulfate is the easiest to distinguish. The clue is in its name: "eth." There's clues in its synonyms too: "sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl ether sulfate." To create SLES, first the dodecyl alcohol is ethoxylated (a process described earlier in the "More Ethylene Based Ingredients" subsection). Then,

"The resulting ethoxylate is converted to a half ester of sulfuric acid, which is neutralized by conversion to the sodium salt.[1] The related surfactant sodium lauryl sulfate (also known as sodium dodecyl sulfate or SDS) is produced similarly, but without the ethoxylation step."

"Sodium Laureth Sulfate," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

SLES includes an ethoxylation step, while the others do not.

The distinction between SLS and SCS is a bit hazier. In fact, both are listed as synonyms for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and share the same CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) Number.

"SDS is synthesized by treating lauryl alcohol [dodecyl alcohol] with sulfur trioxide gas, oleum, or chlorosulfuric acid to produce hydrogen lauryl sulfate.[5] The resulting product is then neutralized through the addition of sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate."

"Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Essentially:

  • dodecyl alcohol + some form of sulfur -> hydrogen lauryl sulfate
  • hydrogen lauryl sulfate + sodium hydroxide OR sodium carbonate -> SDS/SLS/SCS

As for the minor distinctions, "lauryl" and "dodecyl" are interchangeable terms in chemistry, so SDS and SLS are two names for the exact same thing. The difference between SDS/SLS and SCS is the purity of the dodecyl/lauryl alcohol.

"Lauryl [dodecyl] alcohol can be used in pure form or may be derived from either coconut or palm kernel oil by hydrolysis (which liberates their fatty acids), followed by hydrogenation.[citation needed] When produced from these sources, commercial samples of these "SDS" products are actually not pure SDS, rather a mixture of various sodium alkyl sulfates with SDS being the main component.[6] For instance, SDS is a component, along with other chain-length amphiphiles, when produced from coconut oil, and is known as sodium coco sulfate (SCS).

"Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate," Wikipedia. Accessed 7/29/2020.

When the dodecyl alcohol is pure, the reaction with sulfur leads to pure SDS/SLS. When the lauryl alcohol is not pure, like when it is derived coconut oil, there are other fatty alcohols in the mix. The reaction with sulfur leads to SDS/SLS plus small amounts of the other sulfates from the other fatty acids. Which are collectively called sodium coco sulfate.

Seventh Generation actually has a pretty good explanation of the resulting differences between SCS and SLS.

"SLS and SCS are very similar ingredients. Both SLS and SCS contain the same sodium and the same sulfate - where they differ is SLS has a slightly shorter chemical chain length than SCS. What does that mean? Think of it like a chain of box cars on a train. SLS would be a train with 12 box cars, followed by an additional train with 14 box cars. SCS would have the same, a 12 box car train, followed by the 14 box car train just like SLS, but then an additional 16 car train follows. Therefore, SCS contains SLS within it, and then a little more."

"What Is Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, And Why Do We Use It?" Seventh Generation. Accessed 7/29/2020.

In the end, though, regardless of the distinctions between SDS, SCS, and even SLES, they all contain sulfur. So even assuming that the dodecyl alcohol is actually plant derived, that's only half the story. And once again, the other half includes a petrochemical industry byproduct, making it hard to consider these ingredients "sustainable."

Ingredient Sustainability Conclusions and Summaries

"Plant based" or "plant derived" simply isn't a good enough standard for determining whether an ingredient is sustainable.

The burden of proof is on the manufacturers to demonstrate that either:

  • petrochemicals and other fossil fuel industry byproducts are not used in any stage of the production of the ingredients in their products, or
  • potential petrochemicals (like ethylene and methane) that are used are sourced from non-petrochemical alternatives.

As demonstrated repeatedly, saying "derived from" is generally only the half the story. Consumers are owed more detailed explanations so we can make truly informed decisions.

In my book, if a petrochemical or other fossil fuel industry byproduct is used to produce an ingredient, then I do not consider that ingredient to be sustainable.

The more unsustainable ingredients a product has, the less sustainable I consider the product to be.

I was not able to research the production of every ingredient in the ingredients lists in the comparison chart. There were just too many for one person to tackle. Instead, I combed through the ingredients lists looking for:

  • ingredients I know are produced with petrochemicals like ethylene, methanol, and sulfur based on the research outlined above, and
  • ingredients with petrochemical red flags, like "eth," "meth," and "sulf."

Those ingredients are listed in a separate column titled "Petrochemical Based Ingredients." Please keep in mind, this is may not be a complete list. The names can be pretty misleading, so there may be some petrochemical/fossil fuel based ingredients that I missed.

There is also the risk that a listed ingredient is in fact NOT petrochemical based even though it's listed in that column. For example, a glucoside is produced with methanol, but maybe that methanol comes from a landfill rather than the oil and natural gas industry. In that case, it wouldn't really be petrochemical based. I included them on the list anyway because I did not see any proof to the contrary from any of the detergent ingredient manufacturers. Guilty until proven innocent.

Only 3 products had no petrochemical based ingredients:

  • Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder
  • Meliora Laundry Powder
  • The Simply Co. Laundry Detergent

The following products had up to 2 petrochemical based ingredients:

  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Blueland Laundry Tablets
  • Meliora Oxygen Brightener
  • Nellie's Laundry Soda
  • Nellie's Oxygen Brightener
  • Seventh Generation Free & Clear Powder Laundry Detergent
  • Sheets Laundry Club Laundry Detergent Sheets - Free and Clear (although do note that their ingredients list was vague)

The following products had more than 2 petrochemical based ingredients:

  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfume and Dyes
  • Dropps Sensitive Skin Laundry Detergent Pod
  • Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster, Unscented
  • Earth Breeze Laundry Sheets
  • P&G EC30 Laundry Swatches
  • P&G Tide Powder Laundry Detergent
  • Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets
  • TruEarth Eco-Strips Laundry Detergent
  • Truman's Get a Load of This Laundry Bars

Resources for Finding More Information

It's a lot easier to find information about the effects of ingredients on human health and the environment than it is to find information on how the ingredients are produced.

There are a few resources I look to:

The EWG Skin Deep Guide to Cosmetics database is a great place to look up individual ingredients. They:

  • score the ingredient on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the best, 10 being the worst) to reflect "known and suspected hazards," ("Frequently Asked Questions," EWG.org. Accessed 7/28/2020.)
  • provide a data availability score which "reflects how much scientists know – or don’t know – about an ingredient’s safety," ("Frequently Asked Questions," EWG.org. Accessed 7/28/2020.)
  • list the functions of the ingredient,
  • provide a list of synonyms, which can provide important clues about how the ingredient is made, and
  • provide details about known toxicity and effects on the environment.

The EWG's Guide to Healthy Cleaning database is a great place to look up cleaning products. They score the products on an A to F scale (A being the best, F being the worst), based on the scores (also A to F) of the ingredients in the products. They also list:

  • list the ingredients,
  • the ingredient scores,
  • the areas of concern for low scoring ingredients, and
  • whether or not the product is "green certified."

If you're interested in learning more about their scoring system and methodology, check out About EWG's Guide to Healthy Cleaning.

The Safer Chemical Ingredients List is part of the EPA's Safer Choice program.

"Before a product can carry the Safer Choice label, EPA reviews all chemical ingredients, regardless of their percentage in the product. Every ingredient must meet strict safety criteria for both human health and the environment, including carcinogenicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, toxicity to aquatic life, and persistence in the environment."

"What does the Safer Choice label mean?" EPA.gov. Accessed 7/29/2020.

The PubChem database is a great place to look up individual ingredients.

"PubChem records are contributed by hundreds of data sources. Examples include: government agencieschemical vendorsjournal publishers, and more."

"About PubChem," PubChem Docs. Accessed 7/29/2020.

A chemical's entry includes lots on information, like the structure, synonyms, chemical safety, and toxicity.

Safety Data Sheets (SDSs), formerly known as Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), include

"information such as the properties of each chemical; the physical, health, and environmental health hazards; protective measures; and safety precautions for handling, storing, and transporting the chemical."

"Hazard Communication Standard: Safety Data Sheets," OSHA.gov. Accessed 7/29/2020.

Unfortunately there is no easily searchable, free, central, government run database for SDSs because they are created by the individual manufacturers. For example, the SDS for Tide Laundry Powder, or the SDS for EC30 Laundry Swatches, are both produced by P&G. They're still a good place to start examining ingredients and possible harm to human health.

Toxicity Details in the Comparison Chart

I did not comb through each and every ingredient in each and every product to research toxicity. For one thing, there were just too many for one person to tackle in a reasonable time. For another, sometimes there just isn't enough information about an ingredient or product on the web to find any meaningful information.

What is included?

First, for each product there is a complete list of ingredients, according the manufacturers. If you feel so inclined, this list will make it easy for you to research every ingredient and make a judgement for yourself about its human and environmental safety.

I also list the EWG product rating and whether or not the product had any safety or green certifications, like the EPA Safer Choice designation. Unfortunately not every product had an EWG rating. For products without a rating, I looked up the individual ingredients. If I could find it in the EWG database, I included the rating in parentheses next to the ingredient in the ingredients list.

Here are the products ranked by EWG rating:

A:

  • Biokleen Laundry Powder - Free & Clear
  • Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder, Fragrance Free
  • Melioria Laundry Powder
  • Seventh Generation Free & Clear Laundry Powder

B:

  • Dropps Sensitive Skin Laundry Detergent Pod
  • Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster Pod
  • Nellie's Laundry Soda

D

  • Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent - Free of Perfume and Dyes
  • P&G Tide Laundry Powder

The following products were not rated by the EWG:

  • Blueland Laundry Tablets
  • Earth Breeze Laundry Sheets
  • Meliora Oxygen Brightener
  • Nellie's Oxygen Brightener
  • P&G EC30 Laundry Swatches
  • Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets
  • Sheets Laundry Club Laundry Detergent Sheets
  • The Simply Co. Laundry Detergent
  • TruEarth Eco-Strips Laundry Detergent
  • Truman's Get a Load of This Laundry Bars

Price is a pretty obvious measure, but in some cases it was difficult to make an apples to apples comparison. Quite a few companies offer a discount for buying in bulk or choosing a subscription.

I tried to give a fair representation of the prices in the "price per load" break downs, comparing a basic purchase, with and without a subscription. If the company offered additional buying options, I outlined them in the "Price Notes" column. If you want to find the absolute lowest price per load, that's where to look.

For example, the per load price of Dropps Laundry Detergent for a standard box of 64 pods, without a subscription, is $0.38. However, if you spend $126 on a box of 804, the price plummets to $0.16 per load. But that's a lot of money to drop at once for a large quantity of detergent. If you have the space and the funds, it's absolutely the more economical option. But if you're like me and live in a 900 square foot house, you might have some space constraints that make such a large purchase impractical, despite the savings.

Price Per Load, Lowest to Highest

The price ranking below is based on what I think are fair assumptions for the average person. I think the average person could be talked into a monthly or bimonthly subscription for a lower price, so if a company offers a subscription discount, that's the price indicated below. I don't think the average person could be talked into buying 800 loads at once even for the rock bottom price, so those prices are not included.

If the price has a * next to it, that means a lower price might be available. See the comparison chart for more details.

Soaps and Detergents

  1. Biokleen Laundry Powder: $0.17
  2. P&G Tide Powder: $0.19
    Arm & Hammer Powder Laundry Detergent: $0.19
  3. Meliora Laundry Powder: $0.20
  4. Nellie's Laundry Soda: $0.21
  5. Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder: $0.24
  6. Dropps Sensitive Skin Laundry Detergent Pod: $0.26*
  7. The Simply Co. Laundry Detergent: $0.27
    Blueland Laundry Tablets: $0.27
  8. Sheets Laundry Club Laundry Detergent Sheets: $0.28
  9. Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets: $0.36
  10. TruEarth Eco-Strips: $0.40
    Earth Breeze Laundry Strips: $0.40*
  11. Truman's Laundry Bars: $0.48*
  12. P&G EC30 Laundry Swatches: $0.68

Boosters

  1. Meliora Oxygen Brightener Powder: $0.22
  2. Nellie's Oxygen Brightener Powder: $0.27
    Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster Pod: $0.27 (only booster with bleach activator)*

The Right Answer for Me

My answer ends up being a compromise between these competing priorities, particularly between “actual cleaning power” and “planet and human friendly ingredients.”

Because hygienic cleaning power is so important to me, despite the sustainability limitations of some of the ingredients (sodium percarbonate, PVA, TAED), I have decided to continue to use Dropps Laundry Oxi Booster pods.

But instead of using these booster pods in conjunction with Dropps’ liquid detergent pods, I am switching to either Ingredients Matter Laundry Soap Powder or Meliora Laundry Powder.

Both have A ratings from the EWG and are about the same price. I want to try both to see if I can tell a difference in the cleaning power. The Ingredients Matter product has more ingredients than the Meliora product, and I am curious to see if they produce a noticeably higher level of clean.

The drawback of the Ingredients Matter product is that it comes in a bag with a (most likely) PVA liner. But they are trying to improve, and their shipping is plastic free. The Meliora product is completely petrochemical free and has plastic free product packaging; I need to confirm that their shipping is plastic free as well.

I think either of these two products paired with the only booster pod available that contains both AOB and a bleach activator is the best, most sustainable option for me.

If you choose to take my word for it and do exactly as I have done, I’m flattered and honored by your trust. I do, however, strongly encourage you to read through all the information above. You might find your priorities are different, and another detergent option is more sustainable for you.

Finally, if you can’t find the perfect product, reach out to the companies and let them know what you want! We are being heard. We are making a difference. We just need to keep pushing!

Plastic Free Laundry Detergents Detailed Comparison Spreadsheet

Click here to view the spreadsheet in a separate window.

Plastic Free Laundry Detergent Guide | July 2020 Update | plastic free, zero waste living | Handy Finch

Updates

This information was originally published on July 30, 2020. Prices and products may change without notice. It is your responsibility to confirm the information.

July 31, 2020: More accurate information about Biokleen packaging.

Aug. 4, 2020: Earth Breeze Laundry Strips added.

Aug. 11, 2020: Quick Guide infographic added.

Aug. 20, 2020: New Seventh Generation Zero Plastic Laundry Tablets added.

Sept. 2, 2020: Seventh Generation no longer lists “Free & Clear Laundry Powder” on their products page, so I have crossed the product out where it appears above. Also note that the new Seventh Generation Zero Plastic line is no longer listed on the Grove.co website. I’m not sure what the status is on these products, but will keep an eye out for more information. If the line does not go ahead, I will remove it from the listings as well.